SHIELD
FILING CHECKLIST
Patent Resource Vault · Updated Feb 2026

EVERYPATENTQUESTION.ONE CLEARANSWER.

Comparison tables, prosecution timelines, and straight answers — organized the way a steel filing cabinet should be. No fluff, no paywalls on the basics.

48hrs
avg. response time on provisional
12–18mo
typical prosecution window
3steps
to a filed provisional application
LIVE FAQ QUEUE
Can I patent software?
ANSWERED BELOW ↓
What kills novelty?
Provisional vs. non-provisional?
How long does prosecution take?
1 / 15

PROVISIONAL vs. NON-PROVISIONAL

Which filing buys you what — and at what cost

CRITERIONPROVISIONAL
RECOMMENDED
NON-PROVISIONAL
USPTO filing fee (micro entity)$320$800+
Grants patent protection?No — placeholder onlyYes, when granted
Patent Pending statusImmediateImmediate
Examination by USPTONoneFull examination
Pendency period12 months (expires)18 mo. pub + 2–3 yr exam
Claim requirementsNone requiredAt least 1 independent claim
Specification requirementsInformal — must enableFormal — 37 C.F.R. §1.71
Priority date established?Yes — filing dateYes — or claims prov. date
Can convert to non-prov?Yes — within 12 monthsN/A
Best forIdea stage, conference disclosure, MVP launchReady-to-file, full prosecution

Download the complete Filing Checklist

35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios

UTILITY vs. DESIGN PATENT

Protect how it works vs. how it looks

CRITERIONUTILITY PATENT
RECOMMENDED
DESIGN PATENT
ProtectsFunction, process, structure, compositionOrnamental appearance only
Term (from grant)20 years from earliest filing date15 years from grant
Maintenance fees required?Yes — 3.5, 7.5, 11.5 yr marksNo maintenance fees
Avg. prosecution time2–3 years18–24 months
USPTO fee (micro entity)$800+ (basic)$280 (basic)
Claims allowedUnlimited (fees per claim)1 claim only
Drawings required?Recommended, sometimes requiredRequired — drawings ARE the claim
Prior art vulnerabilityHigh — full novelty & non-obviousnessLimited to ornamental scope
International path (PCT)Yes — via PCT or ParisYes — via Hague Agreement
Best forCore technology, processes, novel mechanismsProduct shape, UI screens, packaging

Download the complete Filing Checklist

35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios

DIY vs. AGENT-ASSISTED PROSECUTION

What you gain — and risk — filing without professional help

CRITERIONPRO SE (DIY)PATENT AGENT / ATTORNEY
RECOMMENDED
USPTO admission required?No — any inventor may fileYes — USPTO registration (Reg. No.)
Claim drafting qualityOften narrow, easily designed aroundBroader scope, layered protection
Office action responseInventor must respond personallyAgent responds within expertise
Prosecution cost (est.)$500–$2,000 in fees$8,000–$25,000 total
Grant rate vs. pro seSignificantly higher (USPTO data)
Prior art search depthKeyword search only (typically)Structured search + FTO analysis
Continuation strategyRarely plannedContinuation/CIP portfolio built in
Freedom to Operate (FTO)Not typically assessedOften included or recommended
International coordinationHigh error riskManaged across jurisdictions
Best forBudget-constrained, simple inventionsAny technology with commercial value

Download the complete Filing Checklist

35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios

Inventors and counsel
who used this exact page.

Real outcomes. Real patent numbers. Every quote is from someone who faced the same 2am question you're asking now.

FILED PROVISIONAL
"Filed our provisional the night before we presented at SXSW. Shield's table was the only thing that made that 48-hour sprint feel survivable."

Marcus Osei

Founder, Vaultform Labs

Provisional → US 11,423,891
BIOTECH
"The DIY vs. agent table saved us from a $4,000 mistake. We tried to write our own claims. We were about to file them."

Priya Nambiar

CTO, Synthos Biotech

Granted · US 11,891,204
PARALEGAL
"I've been a patent paralegal for nine years. This comparison is more useful than half the CLE materials I've sat through."

Deb Holloway

Senior Paralegal, Whitmore & Fitch LLP

Internal training resource
SOLO INVENTOR
"The prosecution timeline breakdown answered the question I'd been afraid to ask my attorney. Turns out 18 months is normal. I was panicking for nothing."

Tomás Reyes

Independent Inventor

US Application 18/344,201
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL
"We use Shield to onboard new IP interns. The comparison tables are cleaner than anything we've built internally."

Jennifer Park

IP Counsel, Meridian Systems

Portfolio: 14 active patents
DESIGN PATENT
"Downloaded the filing checklist at 2am. Filed by 9am. Design patent granted in 14 months."

Kwame Asante

Product Designer

US D1,002,441
94%
Grant rate among checklist users
Based on self-reported outcomes from 312 inventors who downloaded the Shield filing checklist
2.3×
Faster first office action response
Inventors who reviewed the prosecution timeline table responded to OA's 2.3× faster than average

Every question,
organized by topic.

An invention must be novel (not in prior art), non-obvious (not obvious to someone skilled in the field), and useful. It must also fall into a patentable category: process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. Abstract ideas, laws of nature, and natural phenomena are not patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Software-implemented inventions can be patented if they produce a concrete, useful result and are not merely an abstract idea. Post-Alice (Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 2014), software patents must show that the claims are directed to a specific improvement in computer functionality, not just a generic computer performing abstract steps. Framing matters enormously.

Prior art is any evidence that your invention was known before your filing date — patents, published applications, academic papers, products on sale, public demonstrations, or even your own public disclosure (subject to a 1-year grace period in the US under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)). If your invention is disclosed anywhere before you file, it may destroy novelty outside the US entirely.

20 years from the earliest non-provisional filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid at 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years post-grant. Failure to pay any maintenance fee results in expiration. Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) may extend the term for USPTO delays during prosecution.

File a provisional when you need to establish a priority date quickly — before a conference, investor pitch, or product launch — but aren't yet ready for full prosecution. You have 12 months to convert to a non-provisional. The provisional buys time and costs less, but it expires if not converted and never becomes a patent on its own.

In the US, you have a 1-year grace period under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(1) to file after your own disclosure. However, this grace period does NOT exist in most other countries. A public disclosure before filing will permanently bar patent protection in Europe, Japan, China, and most PCT member states. File before you publish, present, or sell.

A continuation is a new application that claims priority to a parent application and pursues additional or different claims on the same disclosure. File a continuation before the parent issues if you want to capture broader claims, different embodiments, or pursue claims that were rejected in the parent. Continuations are a core portfolio-building tool.

USPTO basic filing fees for a non-provisional utility application range from $320 (micro entity) to $1,600 (large entity). Agent/attorney fees typically add $8,000–$15,000 for drafting and filing. Total cost through grant, including examination, responses, and issue fees, commonly runs $15,000–$30,000+ for complex technologies.

An Office Action (OA) is an examiner rejection or objection — it is not a final denial. You have 3 months to respond without extension fees (6 months maximum with fees). Analyze each rejection type: § 102 (novelty), § 103 (obviousness), § 112 (written description/enablement). Amend claims, argue the examiner's position, or both. A well-crafted response is often the difference between grant and abandonment.

Average time from filing to first Office Action is 16–22 months for utility applications. Total prosecution to grant averages 2–3 years. Track-One Prioritized Examination can reduce this to 6–12 months for an additional $4,200 (large entity). Design patents average 18–24 months.

Consider abandonment when: (1) the examiner issues a Final Rejection and the claims cannot be amended to overcome it without losing commercial value; (2) the technology is no longer relevant to your business; (3) prosecution cost exceeds the likely value of the patent; or (4) a competitor has already designed around any claims you could obtain. File a continuation before abandoning if the underlying disclosure still has value.

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) allows you to file one international application that reserves your right to seek patents in 150+ member countries. You file a PCT application within 12 months of your priority date. You then have 18 months (30 months total from priority) to enter national/regional phases in specific countries. The PCT does not grant an international patent — it delays the cost of national filings.

Yes — there is no single "world patent." You can use the PCT to streamline and delay the cost, or file directly under the Paris Convention within 12 months of your priority date. Regional offices like the EPO (Europe) allow a single application covering multiple countries. Each jurisdiction has its own prosecution, fees, and grant requirements.

If you file a patent application in any Paris Convention member country, you have 12 months from that filing date to file in other member countries and claim priority back to your original filing date. This means your international applications will be evaluated as if they were filed on your original priority date — protecting you against intervening prior art.

14 questions indexed · Updated Feb 2026 · Based on 37 C.F.R. and MPEP

DOWNLOAD FULL CHECKLIST

35 steps between your
invention and a filed application.

Used by 1,200+ inventors and IP paralegals. Covers provisional, non-provisional, and design patent filings. Free PDF, no login required — just your email and filing stage.

Confirm inventorship — all true inventors named
Prior art search completed (USPTO, EPO, Google Patents)
Public disclosure date confirmed — grace period calculated
Invention description enables any POSITA to reproduce
At least one independent claim drafted
Dependent claims cover key embodiments
Drawings prepared for all claimed embodiments
Abstract drafted (150 words max)
Entity status confirmed (micro/small/large)
USPTO filing fees calculated and payment method ready
+ 5 more items in the full checklist
FREE DOWNLOAD

Get the Filing Checklist

We'll send the PDF immediately. One email. No drip campaigns. Unsubscribe instantly.

No spam. Instant delivery. Unsubscribe in one click.

1,200+
downloads
Free
always
35
checklist items