PROVISIONAL vs. NON-PROVISIONAL
Which filing buys you what — and at what cost
| CRITERION | PROVISIONAL RECOMMENDED | NON-PROVISIONAL |
|---|---|---|
| USPTO filing fee (micro entity) | $320 | $800+ |
| Grants patent protection? | No — placeholder only | Yes, when granted |
| Patent Pending status | ✓ Immediate | ✓ Immediate |
| Examination by USPTO | None | Full examination |
| Pendency period | 12 months (expires) | 18 mo. pub + 2–3 yr exam |
| Claim requirements | None required | At least 1 independent claim |
| Specification requirements | Informal — must enable | Formal — 37 C.F.R. §1.71 |
| Priority date established? | ✓ Yes — filing date | ✓ Yes — or claims prov. date |
| Can convert to non-prov? | ✓ Yes — within 12 months | N/A |
| Best for | Idea stage, conference disclosure, MVP launch | Ready-to-file, full prosecution |
Download the complete Filing Checklist
35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios
UTILITY vs. DESIGN PATENT
Protect how it works vs. how it looks
| CRITERION | UTILITY PATENT RECOMMENDED | DESIGN PATENT |
|---|---|---|
| Protects | Function, process, structure, composition | Ornamental appearance only |
| Term (from grant) | 20 years from earliest filing date | 15 years from grant |
| Maintenance fees required? | ✓ Yes — 3.5, 7.5, 11.5 yr marks | No maintenance fees |
| Avg. prosecution time | 2–3 years | 18–24 months |
| USPTO fee (micro entity) | $800+ (basic) | $280 (basic) |
| Claims allowed | Unlimited (fees per claim) | 1 claim only |
| Drawings required? | Recommended, sometimes required | Required — drawings ARE the claim |
| Prior art vulnerability | High — full novelty & non-obviousness | Limited to ornamental scope |
| International path (PCT) | ✓ Yes — via PCT or Paris | ✓ Yes — via Hague Agreement |
| Best for | Core technology, processes, novel mechanisms | Product shape, UI screens, packaging |
Download the complete Filing Checklist
35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios
DIY vs. AGENT-ASSISTED PROSECUTION
What you gain — and risk — filing without professional help
| CRITERION | PRO SE (DIY) | PATENT AGENT / ATTORNEY RECOMMENDED |
|---|---|---|
| USPTO admission required? | No — any inventor may file | Yes — USPTO registration (Reg. No.) |
| Claim drafting quality | Often narrow, easily designed around | Broader scope, layered protection |
| Office action response | Inventor must respond personally | Agent responds within expertise |
| Prosecution cost (est.) | $500–$2,000 in fees | $8,000–$25,000 total |
| Grant rate vs. pro se | — | Significantly higher (USPTO data) |
| Prior art search depth | Keyword search only (typically) | Structured search + FTO analysis |
| Continuation strategy | Rarely planned | Continuation/CIP portfolio built in |
| Freedom to Operate (FTO) | Not typically assessed | Often included or recommended |
| International coordination | High error risk | Managed across jurisdictions |
| Best for | Budget-constrained, simple inventions | Any technology with commercial value |
Download the complete Filing Checklist
35-point checklist · PDF · Covers all three comparison scenarios
Inventors and counsel
who used this exact page.
"Filed our provisional the night before we presented at SXSW. Shield's table was the only thing that made that 48-hour sprint feel survivable."
Marcus Osei
"The DIY vs. agent table saved us from a $4,000 mistake. We tried to write our own claims. We were about to file them."
Priya Nambiar
"I've been a patent paralegal for nine years. This comparison is more useful than half the CLE materials I've sat through."
Deb Holloway
"The prosecution timeline breakdown answered the question I'd been afraid to ask my attorney. Turns out 18 months is normal. I was panicking for nothing."
Tomás Reyes
"We use Shield to onboard new IP interns. The comparison tables are cleaner than anything we've built internally."
Jennifer Park
"Downloaded the filing checklist at 2am. Filed by 9am. Design patent granted in 14 months."
Kwame Asante
Every question,
organized by topic.
An invention must be novel (not in prior art), non-obvious (not obvious to someone skilled in the field), and useful. It must also fall into a patentable category: process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter. Abstract ideas, laws of nature, and natural phenomena are not patentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
Software-implemented inventions can be patented if they produce a concrete, useful result and are not merely an abstract idea. Post-Alice (Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, 2014), software patents must show that the claims are directed to a specific improvement in computer functionality, not just a generic computer performing abstract steps. Framing matters enormously.
Prior art is any evidence that your invention was known before your filing date — patents, published applications, academic papers, products on sale, public demonstrations, or even your own public disclosure (subject to a 1-year grace period in the US under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)). If your invention is disclosed anywhere before you file, it may destroy novelty outside the US entirely.
20 years from the earliest non-provisional filing date, provided maintenance fees are paid at 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years post-grant. Failure to pay any maintenance fee results in expiration. Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) may extend the term for USPTO delays during prosecution.
File a provisional when you need to establish a priority date quickly — before a conference, investor pitch, or product launch — but aren't yet ready for full prosecution. You have 12 months to convert to a non-provisional. The provisional buys time and costs less, but it expires if not converted and never becomes a patent on its own.
In the US, you have a 1-year grace period under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(1) to file after your own disclosure. However, this grace period does NOT exist in most other countries. A public disclosure before filing will permanently bar patent protection in Europe, Japan, China, and most PCT member states. File before you publish, present, or sell.
A continuation is a new application that claims priority to a parent application and pursues additional or different claims on the same disclosure. File a continuation before the parent issues if you want to capture broader claims, different embodiments, or pursue claims that were rejected in the parent. Continuations are a core portfolio-building tool.
USPTO basic filing fees for a non-provisional utility application range from $320 (micro entity) to $1,600 (large entity). Agent/attorney fees typically add $8,000–$15,000 for drafting and filing. Total cost through grant, including examination, responses, and issue fees, commonly runs $15,000–$30,000+ for complex technologies.
An Office Action (OA) is an examiner rejection or objection — it is not a final denial. You have 3 months to respond without extension fees (6 months maximum with fees). Analyze each rejection type: § 102 (novelty), § 103 (obviousness), § 112 (written description/enablement). Amend claims, argue the examiner's position, or both. A well-crafted response is often the difference between grant and abandonment.
Average time from filing to first Office Action is 16–22 months for utility applications. Total prosecution to grant averages 2–3 years. Track-One Prioritized Examination can reduce this to 6–12 months for an additional $4,200 (large entity). Design patents average 18–24 months.
Consider abandonment when: (1) the examiner issues a Final Rejection and the claims cannot be amended to overcome it without losing commercial value; (2) the technology is no longer relevant to your business; (3) prosecution cost exceeds the likely value of the patent; or (4) a competitor has already designed around any claims you could obtain. File a continuation before abandoning if the underlying disclosure still has value.
The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) allows you to file one international application that reserves your right to seek patents in 150+ member countries. You file a PCT application within 12 months of your priority date. You then have 18 months (30 months total from priority) to enter national/regional phases in specific countries. The PCT does not grant an international patent — it delays the cost of national filings.
Yes — there is no single "world patent." You can use the PCT to streamline and delay the cost, or file directly under the Paris Convention within 12 months of your priority date. Regional offices like the EPO (Europe) allow a single application covering multiple countries. Each jurisdiction has its own prosecution, fees, and grant requirements.
If you file a patent application in any Paris Convention member country, you have 12 months from that filing date to file in other member countries and claim priority back to your original filing date. This means your international applications will be evaluated as if they were filed on your original priority date — protecting you against intervening prior art.
14 questions indexed · Updated Feb 2026 · Based on 37 C.F.R. and MPEP
DOWNLOAD FULL CHECKLIST